I do not understand why men like Winter and Livingstone would include this in their publication. I had thought a more robust view of the sovereign Triune God over all the nations, all humans, and all events would have been there conviction and passion. I had thought this view of God would have fed their passion for missions, and they would have turned from Boyd's distorted view of God's knowledge and sovereignty. Am I missing something here?
I had hoped the view of God that would characterize this missions organization would have been more like missionary to the New Hebrides John G. Paton, who stated:
"My heart rose up to the Lord Jesus; I saw Him watching all the scene. My peace came back to me like a wave from God. I realized that I was immortal till my Master's work with me was done. The assurance came to me, as if a voice out of Heaven had spoken, that not a musket would be fired to wound us, not a club prevail to strike us, not a spear leave the hand in which it was held vibrating to be thrown, not an arrow leave the bow, or a killing stone the fingers, without the permission of Jesus Christ, whose is all power in Heaven and on Earth. He rules all Nature, animate and inanimate, and restrains even the Savage of the South Seas." (Source)Compare that to Dr. Gregory Boyd's article in this publication which reads:
"Indeed, many people who refuse to believe in God do so because they have a picture of God they find untenable. They assume that believing in God means acepting that he orchestrates the kind of misery Melanie was experiencing...Everything that happens would be the working out of his plan. And since these people can't with integrity accept that, they reject God. This book offers a very different picture of God..." (p. 20-21, "Missions Frontiers", March-April 2008)Boyd's vision of God and of missions is severely skewed and I did not think it matched what the men of this magazine stood for.
No comments:
Post a Comment